Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera - Wikipedia

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera (MILC) is a popular class of digital system cameras. Unlike a compact digital camera, a MILC is equipped with an interchangeable lens mount and unlike a digital single-lens reflex camera, a MILC does not have a mirror-based optical viewfinder.
Various alternative names exist – see terminology – including: Compact System Camera (CSC), Mirrorless System Camera (MSC), Digital Single Lens Mirrorless (DSLM), Digital Interchangeable-Lens System camera, and - finally - Electronic Viewfinder with Interchangeable Lens (EVIL); this latter term not applying to cameras with an optical viewfinder.
As of 2012 there were several MILC camera systems available. In chronological order (by their introduction) and referring to the adopted lens-mount type, they are: Epson R-D1 using Leica M mount in 2004; Leica itself in 2006; Micro Four Thirds mount for Olympus and Panasonic MILCs; NX mount for Samsung MILCs; Sony E-mount for Sony MILCs; Nikon 1 mount, for Nikon MILCs; Pentax Q mount for Pentax small-sensor MILC (Pentax Q); K-mount for both Pentax DSLRs and Pentax large-sensor MILC; and X-mount for Fujifilm MILCs. The Canon EOS M is set for release in October 2012.


Digital camera designs comparison

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 (left side), and the compact digital camera on the right side is Canon PowerShot G11
DSLR cameras are usually equipped with relatively large sensors, and are defined by having a through-the-lens (TTL) optical viewfinder – light enters through the lens, enters a light box, reflects off a mirror, then reflects off a pentaprism (or pentamirror) and exits through an optical viewfinder. When a picture is taken, the mirror flips out of the way, and the light instead hits the imaging surface (film or digital sensor).
Compact cameras are usually equipped with small sensors, do not have a TTL viewfinder and do not have interchangeable lenses. The single lens can be a versatile superzoom as in bridge cameras. Smaller sensors, however, have relatively poor imaging in many situations, most notably low light, being unable to capture as much light as large ones. Though superzoom lenses exist for large sensors too, they suffer disadvantages in criteria such as optical quality and weight compared to more restricted lenses (prime or zoom). For this reason, virtually all modern cameras with large sensors, so-called system cameras, use interchangeable lenses.
MILCs' initial purpose was to provide interchangeable lenses and DSLR-like quality imaging in a small body. To obtain this they replaced the TTL viewfinder with an electronic one. The size of sensors in MILCs varies with the more expensive having DSLR size sensors.
An alternative design, hybrid between DSLRs and MILCs, is the Sony SLT camera, which features a semi-transparent, fixed mirror. The latter is used for continuous phase-contrast auto-focusing, both when taking pictures and when filming videos. SLTs have no optical viewfinder, nor a flipping mirror, so they are intermediate in mechanical complexity and bulk between DSLRs and MILCs.

MILC Types

Situated between compact cameras and DSLRs, two main types of MILCs have developed: compact and DSLR-like. Compact-style ones are approximately the size of larger compact cameras and, particularly with pancake lenses, they can fit in a pocket to some degree. DSLR-style MILCs overlap with entry-level DSLRs, providing a contoured body and extensive features, like DSLRs, but still in a significantly smaller and lighter body.
Not all MILCs have a large sensor: Pentax Q (announced in June 2011) has a 1/2.3" sensor (typical of compact cameras). In September 2011 a new sensor format was announced by Nikon for its first MILC: the CX format,[1] with a sensor area 2.6 times bigger than the 1/1.7" sensor equipping high-end compact cameras, and about half the size of a Four Thirds sensor.[2] The Sony NEX looks like a compact camera with a zoom lens, but has a larger sensor; its APS-C sensor is the same size as that of most (amateur) DSLRs.[3] The Samsung NX10 (APS-C) and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 (Micro Four Thirds) have larger bodies and appearance similar to DSLRs[citation needed], but are significantly smaller than entry-level DSLRs.

Lenses equipping MILCs

Sony supplied 7 E lenses for its NEX system (adopting a large, quasi–APS-C sensor). Panasonic (which shares the Micro Four Thirds standard with Olympus) had 11 lenses for its G cameras. Panasonic lenses are also almost fully compatible with Olympus's CSC "retro" Pen cameras. Likewise, Olympus's 8 Micro Four Thirds lenses (not counting versions of the same lens; e.g., all three versions of the 14-42mm lens are counted together as one lens)[4] are compatible with most Panasonic cameras, in addition to their own. Samsung has 6 different lenses available for its NX cameras (using a APS-C sensor)[5] The Pentax K-01 can use all existing K-mount lenses, but because it lacks an aperture coupling, pre-1983 lenses (i.e., original K and KF) require stop-down metering.[6] Many lens adaptors exist but most do not support auto-focus.

Sensor size

Nikon 1 V1 with Nikkor 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 attached, and the Nikon 1 mount 30-110mm f/3.8-5.6 telezoom lens
(Details and figures of sensor sizes in Sensor size and angle of view and Image sensor format)

There is an inevitable trade-off between sensor size and compactness of the camera, due to the size of the lens required. Sensor size varies among mirrorless interchangeable-lens cameras. The Micro Four Thirds system uses the same size sensor as the 225mm2 Four Thirds System (smallest among DSLRs but nine times the area of typical compact camera 25mm2 1/2.5" sensors), while the Samsung NX cameras and Sony NEX cameras use a 50% larger APS-C size sensor of 370mm2. The Nikon 1 series uses a smaller 115mm2 1" type sensor (13.2×8.8mm) with a 2.7 crop factor[7] and the Pentax Q uses an even smaller compact camera 28.5mm2 1/2.3" image sensor with a crop factor of 5.5, while APS-C has a crop factor of 1.5, Canon APS-C has a crop factor of 1.6, and Micro Four Third MILCs has 2.0.[8]

As of May 2012, the only 24×36 mm (864mm2) MILCs were Leica's M9 and closely related M9-P, and M Monochrom (the latter shooting solely in black-and-white). Since all are rangefinder cameras, they have optical viewfinders and thus can be called MILCs, but not EVILs.


MILCs combine some of the benefits of both compact cameras and DSLRs. Compared to compact cameras, they offer the versatility allowed by interchangeable lenses. In addition to this, those MILCs which are equipped with a large sensor also offer all the advantages associated with it.
Compared to DSLRs, MILCs are smaller (due to fewer parts) and sturdier (due to fewer moving parts). Due to the lack of the mirror system, MILCs equipped by a large, DSLR-like sensor, can place lenses considerably closer to it (flange back distance) when compared to DSLRs. Thus high-quality lenses can be made smaller, cheaper, and lighter (wide-angle lenses in particular). However, current lens selection, though growing, is still relatively limited and expensive compared with the very well-developed DSLR lens market. Compact-style MILCs fitted with a thin "pancake" lens are pocketable, hence as portable as larger compact cameras, but when fitted with larger lenses they are less portable and not in general pocketable.
Noise on shutter activation is quieter as there is no moving mirror. In August 2011 prices of MILCs were higher than the cheapest entry-level DSLRs[citation needed], but decreased sharply and, as of November 2011, some models sold for less than high-end compact, non-system cameras from the same manufacturers.


MILCs share many of the limitations of both compact cameras and DSLRs. These include:

No TTL optical viewfinder

The lack of through-the-lens optical viewfinder (TTL OVF) is a defining feature of MILCs, and also found on compact cameras – a TTL optical viewfinder requires an optical path from taking lens to viewfinder, hence an SLR design.
MILCs primarily use a rear LCD display for arm-level shooting, but some also feature an electronic viewfinder (EVF) for eye-level shooting, or an optical viewfinder that is not TTL (as in a rangefinder), which hence suffers from parallax, particularly at short distances.

Contrast detection autofocus, rather than phase detection autofocus system

Contrast-based AF has generally been slower than the phase-based AF systems found in DSLRs[citation needed], often significantly, until July 2011 when the Olympus Pen E-P3 surpassed top range DSLRs in focusing speed for still shots. The improvement in speed has been achieved by reducing the time taken for the contrast-detection autofocus system to begin operation after half-pressing the shutter button, doubling the sensor readout speed to 120 frames per second (Olympus are soon to use 240 fps in some focus modes), and increasing the speed with which contrast detection routines operate. Although micros from Olympus and other manufacturers also have closed or leapfrogged this gap, there is still a gap in continuous autofocus accuracy and speed, and thus MILCs are still not as good at photographing moving objects, notably in sports, as DSLRs. However, Nikon's "One" system incorporates phase focusing, and Nikon claim it is as fast focusing for sport as their high end DSLRs. One advantage of contrast detection autofocus is that, for still subjects, autofocus accuracy tends to be higher than with phase detect systems, as the camera uses the actual sensor output to determine focus. Therefore, CDAF systems are not prone to calibration issues such as front or back focus as can occur with phase detect systems.
Sony has recently announced an adapter system for their NEX series EVIL cameras that allows their SLT mirror technology to be mounted to NEX cameras by way of adapter. This adapter will allow the E-Mount camera to use A-Mount lenses and bring real time phase detection auto focus for both still and video photography.[9]

Incompatibility with existing lenses

Most MILC camera systems use a new lens mount, which is somewhat incompatible with existing lenses – Micro Four Thirds (Panasonic and Olympus), NX-mount (Samsung), E-mount (Sony), 1-mount (Nikon) and EF-M mount (Canon). This means both that existing lenses cannot be used without an adapter, and that relatively few native lenses exist for these cameras at the time of their introduction, as new lenses must be designed and manufactured for the new mount. The only exception is the Pentax K-01, a mirrorless camera that accepts all legacy K-mount lenses without any adapter, but the consequence is that the K-01 is not as slim as the Sony NEX-7 or the Nikon 1 V1, although slimmer than one of the smallest SLRs on the market, the Pentax K-5.[10]
As the largest investment in a system camera is the lenses, not the body, and lenses often last decades, changing a mount and rebuilding a lens collection is a significant investment.
Adapters exist for legacy lenses although most do not support autofocus on MILC bodies. Micro Four Thirds has adapters with Four Thirds, Canon FD, Leica M, M42, Nikon, Olympus OM, Minolta, Pentax K, and C mounts. The Sony E-mount has an adapter for the older Minolta A mount, Four Thirds, Canon FD, Leica M, M42, Nikon, Olympus OM, Minolta, Pentax K, and C mounts. The Nikon 1 series has an adapter for the company's F-mount, and the Canon EOS M will be introduced with an adapter for that company's EF and EF-S mounts. However, part of the benefit of MILCs is that newer, smaller lenses can be used; to realize these benefits, either new lenses or lenses for short flange distance legacy mounts, such as those used on rangefinder cameras, are required.
This can be compared with the situation for APS-C sized DSLRs, where the Canon EF-S and Nikon DX lenses are specifically designed to cover only the smaller imaging circle required for the smaller sensor, reducing lens size and manufacturing cost. However, they maintain the same mount distance to the sensor, providing compatibility with lenses designed for the larger full 35mm sensor size.
This drawback, however, is somewhat balanced by the fact that most MIL cameras are aimed at the "point-and-shoot" market where users rarely build a large system around their cameras and are usually satisfied with the lens supplied with the camera or, at best, purchase an all-around "super-zoom" lens to cover all possible shooting situations.
For manufacturers, this strategy eliminates price competition for their new lenses from second-hand legacy lenses.


There is some ambiguity in classification, as this is an emerging category and design has not stabilized, so the precise defining characteristics are not agreed on, as reflected in different names for the category.
As a product category, this generally refers to new, entirely digital designs, rather than adaptations of designs from the film era with only the film replaced by a digital sensor. Thus, dispensing with the traditional optical viewfinder (as in the "EVIL" term), at least in the core design, is generally seen as defining, but some designs include optional optical viewfinders, though not TTL.
Notably, whether the Leica M8 (and M9) and the Sigma DP1 (and, DP1S & DP2) should be included is unclear, as both of these feature large sensors in a mirrorless design, but differ in other respects – these are generally excluded.
For example, the Leica M9 is a rangefinder – a legacy design – and is essentially the same design as previous Leica film cameras. The Leica is also significantly more expensive (US $5,000+, compared to $500–$1,000 to the other cameras in this category), and in most camera discussions is considered a distinct category.
The Sigma DP1 was very similar to compact-type MILCs, but features a fixed lens, and is generally considered a pioneering precursor, not precisely of this class. Similarly, the Leica X1 is a high-end fixed-lens camera, and not strictly comparable to MILCs.
MILCs are sometimes distinguished as having an electronic viewfinder (rather than an optical), as in the EVIL designation, but among the group of products, there are cameras with an additional see-through optical viewfinder (as can be added to the Olympus PEN E-P3 or the Leica X1), and products with an electronic/optical viewfinder (as can be found in the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 and Samsung NX20). However, these optical viewfinders are not TTL, unlike in SLRs.

Systems comparison

System Models Lens mount Sensor size Stabilization Throat diameter Flange focal distance Focus system Release date
Canon EOS M Canon EOS M Canon EF-M 22.3 × 14.9 mm mm APS-C Lens-based 58 mm 18 mm Hybrid Contrast-detection/Phase detection autofocus October 2012[11][12]
Fujifilm XF Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-mount 23.6 × 15.6 mm APS-C Lens-based
17.7 mm Contrast-detection autofocus January 2012
Leica M Leica M8, M9, M9-P, M Monochrom; Epson R-D1, R-D1s, R-D1x, R-D1xG Leica M-mount 35.8×23.9 mm full-frame (M9, M9-P, and M Monochrom), 27×18 mm half-frame (M8), 23.7×15.6 mm pseudo–APS-C (R-D1) none 44 mm 27.80 mm Rangefinder March 2004 (R-D1)
Micro Four Thirds system Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1, G10, G2, G3, GH1, GH2, GF1, GF2, GF3, GX1 (still cameras), Panasonic AG-AF100 (video camera)
Olympus PEN E-P1, E-P2, E-P3, E-PL1, E-PL2, E-PL3, E-PM1 OM-D E-M5
Micro Four Thirds 17.3×12.98 mm 4/3 Lens-based (Panasonic); In body (Olympus) ~38 mm 20 mm Contrast-detection autofocus October 2008 (G1)
Nikon 1[13] Nikon 1 J1, V1 Nikon 1 mount 13.2 × 8.8mm 1" Nikon CX Lens-based
17 mm Hybrid Contrast-detection/Phase detection autofocus October 2011
Pentax K Pentax K-01 Pentax K mount 23.6 × 15.6 mm APS-C Sensor-based
45.46 mm Contrast-detection autofocus February 2012
Pentax Q Pentax Q Q-mount 1/2.3" Sensor-based 38 mm[14] 9.2 mm[15] Contrast-detection autofocus June 2011
Ricoh GXR Ricoh GXR Sealed interchangeable sensor lens unit system, and Leica M-mount Depends on each sealed interchangeable sensor lens unit: APS-C, 1/1.7", 1/2.3" depends Contrast-detection autofocus for sealed camera units, manual focus (display-assisted) for Leica M mount unit November 2009
Samsung NX Samsung NX10, NX5, NX100, NX11, NX200, NX20 Samsung NX-mount 23.4 × 15.6 mm APS-C Lens-based 42 mm 25.5 mm Contrast-detection autofocus January 2010
Sony α NEX NEX-3, NEX-5, NEX-C3, NEX-5N, NEX-7 (still cameras), NEX-VG10 NEX-VG20 (video camera) Sony E-mount 23.4 × 15.6 mm APS-C Lens-based 46.1 mm (1.815 inch) 18 mm Contrast-detection autofocus June 2010


The category started with Epson R-D1 (released in 2004), followed by Leica M8 (released September 2006) and then the Micro Four Thirds system, whose first camera was the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1, released in Japan in October 2008.[16]
The Sigma DP1 (released spring 2008) is also mirrorless with a large sensor, this time in a compact body, but with a fixed lens, as is the Leica X1 (at US $2,000); these may be classed as "high-end compact", but are generally considered separate.
A more radical design is the Ricoh GXR (November 2009), which features, not interchangeable lenses, but interchangeable lens units – a sealed unit of a lens and sensor.[17][18][19] This design is comparable but distinct to MILCs, and has so far received mixed reviews, primarily due to cost; As of 2012 the design has not been copied.
Following the introduction of the Micro Four Thirds, several other cameras were released in the system by Panasonic and Olympus, with the Olympus PEN E-P1 (announced June 2009) being the first in a compact size (pocketable with a small lens). The Samsung NX10 (announced January 2010) was the first camera in this class not using the Micro Four Thirds system – rather a new, proprietary lens mount (Samsung NX-mount). The Sony Alpha NEX-3 and NEX-5 (announced 14 May 2010, for release July 2010) saw the entry of Sony into the market, again with a new, proprietary lens mount (the Sony E-mount), though with LA-EA1 and LA-EA2 adapters for the legacy Minolta A-mount.
In June 2011 Pentax announced the 'Q' mirrorless interchangeable lens camera and the 'Q-mount' lens system. It will have a smaller 1/2.3 inch 12.4 megapixel CMOS sensor.[20]
In September 2011 Nikon announced their Nikon 1 system which consists of the Nikon 1 J1 and Nikon 1 V1 cameras and lenses. The V1 features an electronic viewfinder.[13]


MILCs can be seen as replacing or supplementing the existing categories of compacts, DSLRs, and bridge cameras. Most often, a MILC (either compact-style or DSLR-style) can be a step up from a compact, instead of or on the way to DSLRs. Alternatively, a compact-style MILC can be a more portable supplement to a DSLR, instead of a compact camera. More rarely, a MILC can be a third camera, in addition to a DSLR and compact – not portable enough for everyday (always carried) use, but not as serious as a dedicated DSLR, instead being relatively portable, for walking around and occasional shooting. They are less frequently compared to bridge cameras, as despite filling a similar intermediate niche, they differ significantly in design.
Compared to high-end compact cameras compact-style MILCs equipped with a large sensor provide better image quality. Their lens systems, though, make them considerably bulkier (zoom lenses in particular). Small-sensor MILCs have no image-quality advantage over high-end compacts, but they offer more versatility (due to interchangeable lenses).
DSLR-style MILCs are in most respects very similar to entry-level DSLRs, though DSLR-style MILCs are significantly smaller and light, most notably in being thinner, and also quieter due to lack of flipping mirror. MILC lenses are smaller than comparable DSLR lenses, but current MILC lens selection is very limited and relatively expensive.

Bridge cameras

MILCs occupy a similar niche to bridge cameras, being intermediate between compacts and DSLRs, but in many respects make opposite design decisions, and complement rather than replace each other: with rare exception, bridge cameras use a small sensor, a fixed superzoom lens, and DSLR-style body, while MILCs use a large sensor, interchangeable lenses (with lower zoom factor), and either a compact-style or DSLR-style body. The difference is because a small sensor can be sufficiently provided for by a superzoom lens, which can hence be fixed, and since superzoom lenses are relatively large, there is little benefit in having a compact body. The small sensors on bridge cameras also boast an extremely high crop factor (typically above 5.0), thus allowing such cameras to achieve zoom ranges that are physically impossible on DSLRs and cameras utilizing larger sensors. This trait alone makes a bridge camera much more versatile than DSLRs and MILCs whose lens lineups are usually not capable of achieving anything more than the 35mm focal length equivalent of 500mm; in contrast, most bridge cameras usually ship with lenses that are capable of providing a 35mm focal length equivalent of more than 600mm, with some cameras even capable of exceeding 800mm: Nikon's Coolpix P510, for example, has a 35mm equivalent zoom range of 24-1000mm.
Large sensors, by contrast, are more demanding on lenses and hence interchangeable lenses are generally used to cover the range (though compare fixed-lens Sigma DP1 and Leica X1); smaller lenses allow an overall small camera, hence the possibilities of compact-style MILCs, while DSLR-style bodies are still easier to use for dedicated photography.
One exception to the rule that bridge cameras have small sensors is the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1, now discontinued, which featured a large sensor and a fixed lens. The current Canon PowerShot G1 X also features the same combination.


As of 2011, there is no widely accepted term for this class of cameras. The most-used technical term appears to be mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, MILC, while Panasonic and Olympus called them new-generation system cameras. There seems to be more support for the first term, a poll at the DPreview website suggests.[21] Panasonic also calls its bodies Compact System Cameras (CSCs) or Compact Hybrid Cameras (video/still.)[22] Samsung also uses the term CSC.[23] Sony categorises under the broad term Interchangeable Lens Cameras, and differentiates its NEX line by its lens mount (called E), versus its older (A) mount.[24]
A term often wrongly used as an alternative to MILC is the unfortunate acronym EVIL camera (electronic viewfinder with interchangeable lens). It should not be used as a synonym of MILC because MILCs may have an optical viewfinder. The term EVIL was coined by Charlie Davis in August 2007,[25] then popularized via a October 2007 posting on DPReview, repeated on a Wired blog.[26][27] Since then DPReview have actually used MILC for their review of the Olympus E-PL1 in May 2010.[28] As of September 2010, Popular Photography uses the term ILC, for "interchangeable-lens compact"[29][30] even though some of these cameras may not be that compact (Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 or GH2).
The term "hybrid cameras", is an alternative name, and is used by some retailers. The name originates from looking at the cameras as a cross breed, and a best of two worlds, kind of camera.
Other terms include SLD (single-lens digital or single-lens direct-view),[31] used on the Imaging Resource website,[32] but in their review of Panasonic's new G3 model on 12 May 2011, Imaging Resource referred to simply "the Compact System Camera space".[33] Similarly, DSLM (digital single lens mirrorless), officially adopted by Panasonic in 2012, starting with their G5 model,[34][35] denotes that, like a DSLR, the image from the "taking" lens is used in the framing viewfinder (or LCD), but that the image is transmitted to the viewfinder without the use of a mirror ("reflex").
Finally, Mirrorless System Camera (MSC) is gaining some support amongst third-party retailers and forums.


Compact-style MILCs with pancake lenses have generated significant excitement in the photographer community, as they finally provide a pocketable digital camera with a large sensor (hence high image quality). DSLR-style MILCs, and compact-style MILCs with larger lenses have also generated interest, but more as refinements on the overall DSLR concept, rather than creating new possibilities.
Beyond the interest to consumers, MILCs have created significant interest in camera manufacturers, having potential to be a disruptive technology in the high-end camera market. Significantly, MILCs have fewer moving parts than DSLRs, and are more electronic, which plays to the strengths of electronic manufacturers (such as Panasonic, Samsung and Sony), while undermining the advantage that existing camera makers have in precision mechanical engineering.
Nikon has announced the Nikon 1 series on 21 September 2011, and claims that it is "Nikon's most significant announcement since we introduced our first digital camera 14 years ago".[36] It is a high-speed MILC which features world's fastest autofocus (10 fps) and world's fastest continuous shooting speed (60 fps) among all cameras with interchangeable lenses including DSLRs.[37] Canon was the last of the major makers of DSLRs, announcing the Canon EOS M in 2012.
Longer-term, MILCs may replace DSLRs entirely in some categories or among some manufacturers, with Olympus America's DSLR product manager speculating that by 2012, Olympus DSLRs (the Olympus E system) may be mirrorless, though still using the Four Thirds System (not Micro Four Thirds).[38]
Panasonic UK's Lumix G product manager John Mitchell while speaking to the Press at the 2011 "Focus on Imaging" show in Birmingham, reported that Panasonic "G" camera market share was almost doubling each year, and that UK Panasonic "G" captured over 11% of all interchangeable camera sales in the UK in 2010, and that UK "CSC" sales made up 23% of the Interchaneable lens market in the UK, and 40% in Japan.[39]
As of May 2010, interchangeable-lens camera pricing is comparable to and somewhat higher than entry-level DSLRs, at US$550 to $800, and significantly higher than high-end compact cameras. As of May 2011, interchangeable-lens camera pricing for entry MILCs appears to be lower than entry-level DSLRs in some markets e.g. the USA.

See also


  1. ^ "Built From The Ground Up: The Nikon 1 System Balances Speed, Style And Simplicity To Creatively Capture All Of Life’s Spontaneous Moments". Nikon. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
  2. ^ Butler, R (September 21, 2011). "Why make a small-sensor mirrorless camera?". Digital Photography Review. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
  3. ^ "Sony Alpha NEX-5 hybrid camera review". Pocket Lint. June 7, 2010.
  4. ^ "Products (Lenses)". Micro Four Thirds. Four Thirds. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  5. ^ "Lenses, Flashes, Batteries and more". Digital Camera Accessories. Samsung. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  6. ^ Diallo, Amadou; Butler, Richard; Britton, Barnaby (March 2012). "Pentax K-01 Hands-on Preview". Digital Photography Review. Retrieved 2012-03-22.
  7. ^ "Nikon announces Nikon 1 system with V1 small sensor mirrorless camera". Digital Photoraphy Review. 21 September 2011.
  8. ^ "Pentax Q: Too little, too late and too much?". CNet. June 22, 2011.
  9. ^ "Digital Camera Lens Adapter | α NEX Camera Mount Adapter | LA-EA2". Store. USA: Sony. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  10. ^ "Pentax Launches K-01 Mirrorless Camera, World Misses the Point". February 3, 2012.
  11. ^ "Put Your Creativity Into Motion With The New EOS M Digital Camera" (Press release). Canon U.S.A., Inc.. July 23, 2012. Retrieved July 24, 2012.
  12. ^ Westlake, Andy (July 23, 2012). "Canon EOS M hands-on preview". Digital Photography Review. Retrieved July 24, 2012.
  13. ^ a b Nikon announces Nikon 1 system with V1 small sensor mirrorless camera, DPReview, 2011-09-21.
  14. ^ By admin, on June 23rd, 2011 (2011-06-23). "Pentax Q". Photoclubalpha. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  15. ^ "Pentax Q Compact System Camera - Initial Test". Imaging-resource.com. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  16. ^ "Panasonic Lumix G1 reviewed". Digital Photography Review.
  17. ^ Joinson, Simon (October 2009), Ricoh GXR Preview, DPReview.
  18. ^ Rehm, Lars; Joinson, Simon; Westlake, Andy (March 2010), Ricoh GXR/A12 50mm Review, DPReview.
  19. ^ Rehm, Lars; Joinson, Simon (March 2010), Ricoh GXR/S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Review, DPReview.
  20. ^ Pentax Q small-sensor mirrorless camera announced and previewed, DPReview, 2011-06-23
  21. ^ "Quick polls". Digital Photography Review. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  22. ^ Lumix Digital Cameras, Panasonic.
  23. ^ "20.3 Megapixel Compact System Camera NX200 – Digital Cameras". Samsung. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  24. ^ E series, Sony.
  25. ^ Davis, Charlie. "4:3 Camera Project". Here Ugo. Archived from the original on 2007-10-22.
  26. ^ The EVIL Camera Design Project update..., DPReview.
  27. ^ EVIL camera: Not Actually Evil, Wired, 2007-10.
  28. ^ Olympus E-PL1, DPReview, "MILC".
  29. ^ Rowe, Robin (September 16, 2010), Future Tech: A look at Next Gen Cameras – Edible cameras. Focus that changes after you shoot. What's really in store for photo technology?, PopPhoto.
  30. ^ Joe0Bloggs (6:25:25 AM, Wednesday, May 19, 2010 (GMT)), "How about ILC "interchangeable lens compact", Forums, DPReview – early use of the term.
  31. ^ "Sony NEX-5 review | Digital cameras | Movies". Reviews. PC Pro. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  32. ^ "Digital Cameras, Digital Camera Reviews". The Imaging Resource!. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  33. ^ "Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 Compact System Camera - Review". Imaging-resource.com. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  34. ^ Laing, Gordon (July 2012). "Panasonic Lumix G5". CameraLabs.com. Retrieved July 18, 2012. "Panasonic also chose the G5 launch to rename this product category from Compact System Camera (CSC) to Digital Single Lens Mirror-less, or DSLM for short."
  35. ^ "LUMIX® G5 16 Megapixel Compact System Camera". Panasonic USA. Retrieved July 23, 2012.
  36. ^ Nikon announces new Nikon 1 compact system camera range with two cameras, lenses and accessories Whatdigitalcamera
  37. ^ Nikon announces Nikon 1 system with V1 small sensor mirrorless camera Dpreview
  38. ^ Olympus E system mirrorless in two years. Probably., Monday 22nd February 2010, Damien Demolder
  39. ^ "Panasonic primed for Canon and Nikon fight news". Amateur Photographer. 2011-03-09. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
Fairlie, Rik (2010-04-07). "A Digital Camera That Swaps Lenses, Priced to Please". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2010-05-16.